Part One: Watch the documentary Rikers – An American Jail (Lhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6JH4OGqIU0. Please provide a thorough reflection and commentary on this video. Also, discuss whether you think Rikers is typical or atypical of our jail and prison system? Explain. Pretend that instead of closing Rikers in the next few years that lawmakers decided to implement widespread change. Discuss how you could improve Rikers by addressing (1) individual-level, (2) workgroup and organizational, and 3) societal and cultural influences on ethics.Part Two: Find an example of whistleblowing in corrections (you can look in the textbook, articles, or legitimate news outlets). Provide a link when appropriate. First, discuss the situation and outcome. Also, explain how and why the whistleblower(s) decided to speak out. What ethical system(s) could be used to justify that decision? Explain. How can we change the culture in corrections to make it more supportive of whistleblowing? Finally, what other changes would be necessary? Explain.Part Three: Halvorsen’s (2004) article explores whether it is better to let ten guilty persons go free than to convict one innocent person. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not? Please justify your response with an ethical system(s) and discuss how your response fits in with the goals of punishment. Finally, please discuss whether you agree or disagree with Halvorsen’s stance/conclusion. Be sure you are specific in discussing his take on this issue(i.e., directly reference info from his argument).Assignment 4 RubricAssignment 4 RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart OneReflection/commentary = 15 pointsTypical/atypical & why = 5 pointsIndividual-level change = 10 pointsWorkgroup/organizational change = 10 pointsSocietal/cultural change = 10 points50 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks50 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart TwoDiscuss case = 7 pointsHow & why they spoke out = 5 pointsApplication of ethical system = 7 pointsChange culture of corrections and other changes = 6 points25 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart ThreeAgree/disagree with statement & why = 5 pointsEthical justification = 5 pointsGoals of punishment = 5 pointsAgree with his conclusion/stance = 10 points25 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsTotal Points: 100awmakers decided to implement widespread change. Discuss how you could improve Rikers by addressing (1) individual-level, (2) workgroup and organizational, and 3) societal and cultural influences on ethics.